Etiological significance and molecular and genetic features of coagulase- negative staphylococcus in the structure of infectious processes causes
https://doi.org/10.62963/2073-2899-2026-53-5-11
Abstract
Introduction. Currently, a significant number of infectious processes are caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci, which is often associated with their resistance to antibiotics.
Objective. Purpose of the study: analysis of the frequency of staphylococcus secretion in infections of different localization, determination of their species affiliation and identification of phenotypic and molecular genetic features.
Materials and Methods. The species structure of 1151 bacterial pathogens of various localization in adult patients of medical organizations in Nizhny Novgorod was analyzed. To determine biological features, 330 clinical isolates of staphylococci were selected, including 123 strains of S. aureus and 207 coagulase-negative (CoNS). Species identification of staphylococci was performed using STAPHYtest 24 kits on an ErbaScan analyzer (Erba Mancheim). Antibiotic susceptibility phenotype was determined by the disco-diffusion method, minimal inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics were
determined using SensiLatest Stafi kits. Detection of the mecA gene was carried out by PCR-RB, for the analysis of the strain resistome whole-genome sequencing on the DNBSEQ G-50 platform (BGI, China).
Results. Discussion. Analysis of the species structure of infectious pathogens showed that all staphylococci accounted for 28.72 %, coagulase-negative strains accounted for 18.0 %, with S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus and S. hominis dominating. More than 80 % of the most frequently isolated staphylococci were characterized by phenotypic resistance to penicillin-type drugs, almost half of the isolates were resistant to aminoglycosides, rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulfomethoxazole. There are genes for resistance to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, tetracyclines and sulmomethoxazole in the CoNS genome. In the most frequently isolated CoNS species, an average of 63.1 % of strains had a methicillin resistant phenotype, in addition, genes for resistance to β -lactams, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, tetracyclines and sulfomethoxazole were found in the CoNS genome.
Conclusion. The high level of antibiotic resistance and, consequently, the difficulty of eradication, place CoNS on the same level as S.aureus, and the species affiliation of coagulase-negative staphylococci is almost irrelevant.
About the Authors
N. A. GordinskayaRussian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
N. N. Zaitseva
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
E. V. Boriskina
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
A. E. Alekseeva
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
M. A. Makhova
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
T. L. Denisenko
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
M. Yu. Vilkova
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Борисов А.М., Голубкова А.А., Тутельян А.В., Руженцова Т.А. Бактерии рода Staphylococcus spp. в этиологии гнойно-септических инфекций. Новые фавориты и новые направления в контроле заболеваемости. Эпидемиология и инфекционные болезни. 2025; 4: 82-88. DOI: 10.18565/epidem.2025.15.4.82-88.
2. Леонтьева А.В., Потоцкая Л.А., Червинец Ю.В. Анализ антибиотикорезистентности стафилококков полости рта, кишечника и влагалища. Тверской медицинский журнал. 2023; 1:196-199.
3. Миронова А.В., Миронов А.Ю. Анализ чувствительности коагулазонегативных стафилококков, выделенных из крови, к антимикробным препаратам групп access, watch и reserve. Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. 2026;71(1):45-49. DOI: 10.51620/0869-2084-2026-71-1-45-49.
4. Малеев В.В., Лазарева Е.Н., Понежева Ж.Б., Кузнецова Ю.В. Коагулазонегативные стафилококки как факторы развития синдрома системного воспалительного ответа у пациентов с отягощенным коморбидным фоном. Терапевтический архив. 2024; 11: 1021–1027. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2024.11.202994.
5. Michalik M, Samet A, Podbielska-Kubera A, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) as a significant etiological factor of laryngological infections : a review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020;19(26): 2-10. DOI: 10.1186/s12941-020-00367-x.
6. Paranthaman K, Wilson А, Verlander N, Rooney G., Macdonald N., Nsonwu O. et al. Trends in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), England, 2010–2021. Access Microbiol. 2023; 5(6): DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000491.v3.
7. Vibovska V., Kovarovic V., Msslanova I., Indrakova A., Petras P., Sedo P., Svec P., Fisarova L., Siborova M., Mikalasek K., Sedlacek I., Doskaf J., Pantucek R. Staphylococcus petrasii diagnostics and its pathogenic potential enhanced by mobile genetic elements. Int J Med Microbiol. 2019; 309(8): 151355. DOI: 10.1016/jijmm.2019.151355.
8. Kitaya Sh, Kanamori H, Katori Y, Tokuda K. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Persistent Staphylococcal Bacteremia in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12:454. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12030454.
9. Маслов Ю. Н., Галямова Л. А., Пономарев А. Ю. Коагулазоотрицательные стафилококки как возбудители инфекций, связанных с оказанием медицинской помощи. Лабораторная и клиническая медицина. Фармация. 2023; 3(3): 26 – 34. DOI: 10.14489/lcmp.2023.03.pp.026-034.
10. Скачкова Т.С., Головешкин Е.Н., Абросимова О.А., Тутельян А.В. Акимкин В.Г. Уровень и структура заболеваемости инфекциями, связанными с оказанием медицинской помощи, обусловленными стафилококками, в 2018-2021 гг. Эпидемиология и инфекционные болезни. 2023; 13 (2): 28-33. DOI: 10.18565/epidem.2023.13.2.28-33.
11. Cavanagh JP, Pain M, Bruun JA, Urbarova I, Wai SN, et al. Comparative exoproteome profiling of an invasive and and a commensal Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolate. J.Proteomics. 2019; 97:106-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.11.013.
12. Manandhar S., Singh A., Varma S., Pandey S., Shrivastava N. High level of persister frequency in clinical staphylococcal isolates. BMC Microbiology. 2022; 22, Article: 109. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-022-02529-7.
13. Афанасьевская Е.В., Касатов А.В., Николаева Н.В., Поспелова С.В. Анализ многолетней динамики антибиотикочувствительности коагулазоотрицательных стафилококков, изолированных в различные сроки от пациентов хирургического стационара. Пермский медицинский журнал имени академика Е.А. Вагнера. 2024; 41(2): 5-10.
14. Larsen J., Reisen C.L., Ba X., Sadgrove N., Padilla-Gonzalez G., Simmonds M. et al. Emergence of methicillin resistance predates the clinical use of antibiotics. Nature. 2022; 602:135-141. DOI: 10/1038/s41586-021-04265-w.
15. Samreen I., Ahmad H.A., Malak HH. Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: a potential threat to public health. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021; 27:101-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.001.
16. Российские рекомендации «Определение чувствительности микроорганизмов к антимикробным препаратам» Версия 2024-02. Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия. 2024; 26, прил.2.
17. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 15.0, valid from 2025-01-01.
Review
For citations:
Gordinskaya N.A., Zaitseva N.N., Boriskina E.V., Alekseeva A.E., Makhova M.A., Denisenko T.L., Vilkova M.Yu. Etiological significance and molecular and genetic features of coagulase- negative staphylococcus in the structure of infectious processes causes. Far Eastern Journal of Infectious Pathology. 2026;(53):5-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.62963/2073-2899-2026-53-5-11
JATS XML



